This is a working overview of WADA prohibited list, written for readers who want more than a one-paragraph summary but less than a textbook.
Reviewed 2026-08-01. Anything still debated is marked as such rather than presented as settled.
Research on AOD-9604 also examines how the peptide is measured in biological samples. Analytical methods may include liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry, immunoassays, or both. Detection can be challenging because the peptide is small and may be present at low concentrations. Published methods vary in sensitivity and specificity, so comparative interpretation requires attention to validation details. The presence of related hGH fragments can complicate identification in some matrices.
AOD-9604 has been investigated mainly in the context of body fat and metabolic endpoints. Some early animal and small human studies reported changes in fat mass or lipid markers, but findings were not uniform. Larger, well-controlled trials that would establish efficacy are lacking in the public literature. As a result, claims about weight loss or metabolic benefit remain investigational rather than established. The distinction between a research finding and a proven clinical outcome is central to discussing this peptide.
Detection of AOD-9604 in biological samples relies on analytical techniques capable of distinguishing a small synthetic peptide from related endogenous sequences. Liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry is commonly used for confirmatory analysis. Sample preparation may involve immunoaffinity enrichment or solid-phase extraction to concentrate the peptide. Because the molecule is small and may be present at low concentrations, assay sensitivity and specificity are ongoing analytical challenges. Laboratories also validate methods against reference materials when available.
Regulatory interest in AOD-9604 increased after high-profile anti-doping cases involving peptide products. In some cases, the substance was supplied under alternative names or in compounded preparations, complicating traceability. Sports tribunals and anti-doping panels have discussed whether the peptide was explicitly banned at the time of use, leading to clarifications by the World Anti-Doping Agency. For consumers and researchers, the legal status can vary by jurisdiction, and products marketed as research chemicals may lack independent quality verification.
AOD-9604 is listed as a prohibited substance in sport by the World Anti-Doping Agency. It falls under the peptide hormones, growth factors, related substances, and mimetics class on the prohibited list. Anti-doping organizations treat its presence in an athlete's sample as an adverse finding unless a therapeutic use exemption applies. The prohibition reflects concerns about performance enhancement in competitive settings and the difficulty of distinguishing exogenous peptide use from endogenous hormone fragments.
| Property | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Regulatory status | Not approved as a medicine | Major agencies have not authorized it for therapeutic use. |
| Anti-doping status | Prohibited in sport | Listed among peptide hormones and related substances. |
| Primary research area | Metabolic and body-composition effects | Studies often examine fat mass or lipid markers. |
| Human evidence | Limited and mixed | Public data do not establish clinical efficacy. |
| Analytical detection | LC-MS and immunoassays | Methods vary in sensitivity and validation. |
AOD-9604 is a synthetic peptide that corresponds to a short section of human growth hormone. It is commonly identified as hGH fragment 176-191 because its sequence matches residues at the C-terminal end of the hormone. The molecule contains sixteen amino acids and is made by solid-phase peptide synthesis. Researchers study it for metabolic effects rather than for the growth-promoting actions associated with full human growth hormone. Its small size distinguishes it from the complete 191-amino-acid hormone.
Several names appear in scientific and commercial settings. AOD9604 and AOD-9604 are development codes used interchangeably, while hGH fragment 176-191 describes the same region. The peptide includes a disulfide bond between two cysteine residues, which helps shape its three-dimensional structure. Different suppliers may provide acetate or other salt forms, and purity can vary. These differences matter because analytical tests and biological assays can respond to the specific form being studied.
Proposed mechanisms for AOD-9604 focus on fat cells. Laboratory studies suggest the peptide can increase lipolysis, the breakdown of stored fat, and reduce lipogenesis, the formation of new fat. Unlike full human growth hormone, it does not appear to stimulate substantial IGF-1 production in the studies reported so far. Some evidence points to beta-adrenergic signaling, but the precise receptor targets and downstream pathways remain unresolved. The fragment is not thought to act through the classical growth hormone receptor.
Clinical development of AOD-9604 included trials in people with obesity. Reports from early-phase and mid-phase studies described modest or inconsistent changes in body weight. A phase IIb program did not meet its primary endpoint, and the compound was not approved for medical use. Differences in formulation, delivery route, and participant characteristics may explain some of the variation. Later investigations explored whether the peptide might have effects in other tissues, including cartilage.
Regulatory treatment of AOD-9604 is shaped by its classification as a peptide hormone. The World Anti-Doping Agency lists it as a prohibited substance, and many national anti-doping organizations adopt that list. It does not hold approval as a prescription medicine in the United States, the European Union, or other major markets. Products sold online are frequently labeled for research use only and may not undergo independent quality testing. Import and possession rules differ by country, so legal status depends on local law.
AOD-9604 is a synthetic peptide whose sequence is modeled on the C-terminal region of human growth hormone. Published descriptions commonly place it as a modified fragment corresponding to hGH amino acids 176–191, with a tyrosine residue added or retained at the N-terminus to support detection and handling. It is not intact growth hormone and lacks the full receptor-binding architecture of the parent protein. The molecule was developed as a research candidate for metabolic studies rather than as a replacement for growth hormone therapy. Its identity is defined by its amino acid sequence rather than by any single commercial preparation.
AOD-9604 drew attention in the 1990s and 2000s as a potential anti-obesity agent. Early work explored both injectable and oral routes, which is unusual for a peptide of this size. Animal studies reported changes in fat metabolism without the growth-promoting or insulin-like effects associated with full-length growth hormone. Subsequent human trials produced mixed or modest results, and the compound did not obtain regulatory approval for weight management in major markets. It remains known mainly through research literature, sports anti-doping listings, and non-approved supplement advertising.
== Subcellular distribution == The peptide recognition domain of epiplakin is able to bind to keratins in vitro; however, in cells the epiplakin associates with keratin intermediate filaments networks only under conditions in which cellular stress is absent. Otherwise, epiplakin remains universally cytoplasmic and not bound to the intermediate filaments.
Very early chainsaws used tooth configurations very similar to conventional hand saws. These were very simple saw teeth following a wave pattern (left, centre, right, centre) with no depth gauges as such, relying purely on bar pressure to limit the cutting rate. They were inefficient and slow in use, and were soon superseded by chipper chain. They required great skill and a lot of time to sharpen in the field leading to extended downtime between sessions.
Further work was needed to develop a ration that did not require re-hydration (thus not requiring additional preparation time and water). Further effort, led by Dr. Rauno A. Lampi, Chief of Food Systems Equipment Division at the Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center, concentrated on the refinement of the retort pouch to contain a wet ration with a three-to-ten year shelf life that could be easily shipped, carried in the field, opened and consumed straight out of the package if necessary with no further heat or water. The resulting MRE went into special issue starting in 1981 and standard issue in 1986, using a limited menu of twelve entrées.
As ETD is increasingly popular for protein and peptide structure analysis, implementation on easily available ion-trap mass spectrometers coupled with high resolution mass analyzers continues to evolve.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
Isaria cicadae Miq. 1838, which is the same as Cordyceps cicadae (Miq.) Massee 1895 and Paecilomyces cicadae. The preferred name for this species appears to be Cordyceps cicadae (Miq.) Massee 1895, especially since Isaria has proven to be polyphyletic. Cordyceps cicadae Shing 1975, which is now properly known as Tolypocladium dujiaolongae Y.P. Cao & C.R. Li after its local name in TCM ("Du Jiao Long"). Some Chinese sources believe that it is the teleomorph of "Chan Hua", which is now proven false with the discovery of its true teleomorph. Cordyceps sobolifera (now Ophiocordyceps sobolifera). Japanese sources incorrectly believe that this is the teleomorph of "Chan Hua", but it is in reality another TCM material known as "Xiao Chan Hua" (small cicada flower). The error has spread to Korean, Taiwanese, and Chinese sources. Cordyceps kobayasii, another purported teleomorph of "Chan Hua". Cordyceps chanhua Z.Z. Li et al., which is the correct name of "Chan Hua". In traditional medicine-related papers, each of the names have been used to describe the material known as "Chan Hua". C. cicadae and I. cicadae used to be very common in sources written by Chinese researchers, though they have largely adopted the corrected C. chanhua name. Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese sources still use C. sobolifera. Other reported synonyms include Cordyceps zhejiangensis and C. sinclairii.
Alix Spiegel (2013-12-27). "When Memories Never Fade, The Past Can Poison The Present". NPR. Claire Nowak (2021-06-21). "Only 60 People in the World Have This Insanely Powerful Memory". Reader's Digest. Klochan, Yuliya (2022-05-13). "Understanding the Basis of Superior Memory". Discover Magazine. Jennie Runevitch (2019-02-27). "Total Recall: An IU grad's rare ability creates a map to almost every day of her life". WTHR. Extraordinary Variations of the Human Mind: James McGaugh: Highly Superior Autobiographical Memory. University of California Television (UCTV). 2017-07-12 – via YouTube. People who remember every second of their life. 60 Minutes Australia. 2018-09-21 – via YouTube. Endless Memory, Part 1. CBS News. 2010-12-19 – via YouTube. [Endless Memory, Part 1. CBS News. 2011-06-19 – via YouTube.] Endless Memory, Part 2. CBS News. 2010-12-19 – via YouTube. [Endless Memory, Part 2. CBS News. 2011-06-19 – via YouTube.] Extra: Marilu Henner & "Time Traveling". CBS News. 2010-12-19 – via YouTube. [Extra: Marilu Henner & "time traveling". CBS. 2010-12-19 – via YouTube.] Extra: Memory quiz time. CBS News. 2010-12-19 – via YouTube. [Extra: Memory Quiz Time. CBS. 2010-12-19 – via YouTube.] More people have "Highly Superior Autobiographical Memory" than originally thought. CBS Mornings. 2014-01-13 – via YouTube.
1993/1977) County Court (Pensions Ombudsman) (Enforcement of Directions and Determinations) Rules 1993 (S.I. 1993/1978) Education (School Inspection) (Wales) (No. 2) Regulations 1993 (S.I. 1993/1982) Education (National Curriculum) (Assessment Arrangements for the Core Subjects) (Key Stage 1) Order 1993 (S.I. 1993/1983) Education (National Curriculum) (Assessment Arrangements for the Core Subjects) (Key Stage 3) Order 1993 (S.I. 1993/1984) Social Security (Industrial Injuries) (Prescribed Diseases) Amendment (No. 2) Regulations 1993 (S.I. 1993/1985) Education (School Inspection) (No. 2) Regulations 1993 (S.I. 1993/1986) Education (Further Education in Schools) Regulations 1993 (S.I. 1993/1987) A27 Trunk Road (Polegate Bypass Slip Roads) Order 1993 (S.I. 1993/1990) A27 Trunk Road (Polegate Bypass De-Trunking)Order 1993 (S.I. 1993/1991) A259 Trunk Road Brookland Diversion Order 1993 (S.I. 1993/1992) Education (Further Education Institutions Information) (England) Regulations 1993 (S.I. 1993/1993) Merchant Shipping (Load Lines) Act 1967 (Unregistered Ships) Order 1993 (S.I. 1993/1994) Poultry Breeding Flocks, Hatcheries and Processed Animal Protein (Fees) Order 1993 (S.I. 1993/1998)
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
No. It is not approved as a therapeutic drug by major regulators. It is sold for research purposes in many settings, which is not the same as clinical approval.
It is classified among peptide hormones and related substances that are prohibited in sport. The ban reflects anti-doping rules rather than a judgment that the peptide is effective for performance enhancement.
Human studies are limited and have not produced consistent evidence of meaningful clinical benefit. Some early trials examined metabolic endpoints, but larger confirmatory trials are generally lacking.
Yes, the World Anti-Doping Agency classifies AOD-9604 as a prohibited peptide hormone and related substance. Its use by athletes is banned under the relevant anti-doping code.